Bookmark and Share Email this page Email Print this page Print Feed Feed

ICS: Bunker suppliers must prepare for end of fossil fuels

Nov 30, 2017 02:37 PM

Demand could drop significantly within as little as 25 years, the group says

The following is the text of a news release from the International Chamber of Shipping (ICS):

(LONDON) — Marine bunker suppliers should anticipate that there may no longer be significant demand for fossil fuels from shipping within as little as 25 years, if not sooner, and that the sector is now on an inevitable trajectory toward a future of zero CO2 emissions.

This was the message that the International Chamber of Shipping delivered to the Platts' Mediterranean marine bunker fuel conference in Athens on Thursday.

ICS is representing the world's national shipowner associations at the U.N. IMO negotiations on CO2 reduction.

"Addressing an audience of bunker fuel suppliers about the imminent transition to zero carbon fuels is perhaps like Henry Ford addressing suppliers to horses and carts.' said ICS Director of Policy Simon Bennett. "Henry Ford remarked that if, in say 1890, you had asked someone in the street what they wanted, they would have asked for a faster horse."

"Governments need to recognize that many ships will remain dependent on fossil fuels probably at least until around 2050, just as some people in developed nations were still using horses in 1920. But the momentum created by the Paris Agreement on climate change means that the wholesale switch to alternative fuels and propulsion systems will be relentless and inevitable. This will happen as soon as the technology and bunkering infrastructure permits, which ICS is confident it eventually will, whether using fuel cells or batteries powered by renewable energy, technologies such as hydrogen or some other solution we can't yet anticipate."

Commenting on the development by IMO member states of a comprehensive strategy for addressing CO2 emissions from shipping, scheduled to be adopted in April 2018, Bennett said there was already broad consensus among governments that the goal was zero CO2 emissions and that IMO had already drawn up a list of possible short, medium and longer term candidate CO2 reduction measures for helping shipping to achieve this.

ICS says that the most challenging area in the ongoing IMO negotiations is agreement on the levels of ambition for CO2 reduction, by the sector as a whole, before zero CO2 fuels become widely available.

This is the process of managing the transition to alternative fuels, which has to be set against projections for increased demand for maritime transport (over which the industry has no control) due to massive global population growth, plus increasing prosperity and economic development which international shipping directly facilitates.

The shipping industry, including ICS, has therefore proposed that IMO member states should agree that the initial goal should be to hold the entire sector's total CO2 emissions below 2008 levels.

"This actually very ambitious," Bennett said, "as the CO2 emissions from the rest of the world economy are predicted by the U.N. to continue increasing until the 2030s, even taking account of the commitments governments have made under the Paris Agreement. But the industry has also proposed that IMO should agree upon a percentage by which the sector's total CO2 emissions should reduce by the middle of the century, for example in 2050."

However, ICS asserts that if IMO is to reach agreement on an ambitious mid-century goal before zero carbon fuels are viable and globally available, the percentage cut agreed upon must also be technically and politically realistic.

ICS says that if IMO is to succeed, its strategy must also take account of the legitimate concerns of emerging economies such as China, India and Brazil about the potential impacts on global trade and their economic development, consistent with the U.N. Sustainable Development Goals.

On the controversial question of the possible development of a market based measure to help reduce CO2 emissions from shipping, Bennett said that an MBM – most likely a fuel levy – was likely to go forward as a possible candidate measure as part of the initial UN IMO strategy to be agreed next April.

However, regardless of the political momentum behind a fuel levy, he said the industry remained deeply skeptical about the ability of MBMs to further incentivize meaningful reductions in fuel consumption.

"Fuel is already by far shipping's greatest cost, and we already expect a truly massive increase in bunker costs as a result of the switch to low sulfur fuels required by the IMO global sulfur cap that comes into effect in January 2020." said Bennett.

Add your comment:
Edit Module